ProficientNowTechRFCs

RFC Authoring Standards

RFC Authoring Standards                                           Section 0
Category: Standards Track                                             Index

RFC Authoring Standards

Index | Next →


Document Metadata

FieldValue
Document IDRFC-STANDARDS
TitleRFC Authoring Standards
StatusDraft
CategoryStandards Track
KindStandards
Version2.0.0
AuthorShaik Noorullah
Created2026-02-10
Last Updated2026-02-10

Abstract

This document defines the authoritative standards for authoring Request for Comments (RFC) documents within this organization. All RFC authors MUST adhere to these standards.

RFCs serve as the primary mechanism for proposing, documenting, and preserving architectural decisions for platform systems. This document establishes:

  • RFC identity and classification requirements
  • Document structure and organization rules
  • Content requirements and restrictions
  • Formatting and style standards
  • Review and maintenance procedures

This is a foundational document that governs all other RFCs, including the RFC Kind standards (RFC-RFCSTD-0001 through RFC-RFCSTD-0004).


Scope Boundaries

AspectIn ScopeOut of Scope
ContentRFC authoring rules, structure, formattingKind-specific section requirements (see Kind RFCs)
ApplicabilityAll RFCs in docs/platform/rfcs/ and docs/standards/Implementation documentation
AudienceAll RFC authors and reviewersEnd users of systems

Table of Contents

Core Sections

SectionFileDescription
0. Index00-index.mdThis file — metadata, abstract, navigation
1. Identity and Classification01-identity.mdRFC IDs, status, categories, kinds
2. Versioning02-versioning.mdVersion format, history, supersession
3. Document Structure03-structure.mdMulti-file organization, section requirements
4. Content Requirements04-content.mdWhat RFCs must/must not include
5. Formatting Standards05-formatting.mdHeaders, navigation, tables, diagrams
6. Language and Style06-language.mdRFC 2119 keywords, voice, precision
7. Invariants and Requirements07-invariants.mdHow to specify invariants and goals
8. Rationale Requirements08-rationale.mdDocumenting rejected alternatives
9. Glossary and References09-glossary-refs.mdTerm definitions, citations
10. Review and Maintenance10-review.mdReview checklist, updates, supersession

Appendices

AppendixFileDescription
A. Glossaryappendix-a-glossary.mdTerm definitions
B. Referencesappendix-b-references.mdCitations and version history

Reading Paths

For New RFC Authors

  1. Read Identity and Classification to understand RFC structure
  2. Review Document Structure for file organization
  3. Study Content Requirements for what to include/exclude
  4. Follow Formatting Standards for consistency

For RFC Reviewers

  1. Use the checklist in Review and Maintenance
  2. Verify compliance with Content Requirements
  3. Check Language and Style for RFC 2119 usage

For Quick Reference


Conformance Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals.


End of Index — RFC Authoring Standards

On this page